@base .
@prefix geonames: .
@prefix owl: .
@prefix skos: .
@prefix schema-org: .
@prefix bio: .
@prefix conf: .
@prefix metalex: .
@prefix ocd: .
@prefix rel: .
@prefix dcterms: .
@prefix dbpprop: .
@prefix foaf: .
@prefix bbc: .
@prefix void: .
@prefix dbpedia-owl: .
@prefix dbpedia: .
@prefix frbr: .
@prefix dwc: .
@prefix claros: .
@prefix crm-owl: .
@prefix meta: .
@prefix bmuseum: .
@prefix ods: .
@prefix gml: .
@prefix muninn: .
@prefix xsd: .
@prefix yago: .
@prefix rdfs: .
@prefix units: .
@prefix rso: .
@prefix geo: .
@prefix oad: .
@prefix crm120111: .
@prefix cdoc: .
@prefix bibleontology: .
@prefix prov: .
@prefix crm: .
@prefix cc: .
@prefix shoah: .
@prefix npg: .
@prefix org: .
@prefix gn: .
@prefix ibc: .
@prefix aemetonto: .
@prefix skos-xl: .
@prefix lgdo: .
@prefix rdf: .
@prefix eac-cpf: .
@prefix bibo: .
@prefix time: .
@prefix dc: .
@prefix prism21: .
@prefix po: .
a , owl:Class ;
rdfs:comment "One phenomenon, the Predictive_phenomenon is an indication of the future or current (but still uncertain) existence of another phenomenon, the Future_phenomenon. There is no Cognizer present on the scene, in distinction to the Expectation frame where a Cognizer takes (the equivalent of) Predictive_phenomenon as evidence for (the equivalent of) Future_phenomenon. Many words in this frame also allow a slightly different understanding, whereby Predictive_phenomenon provides clues as to the good or bad Outcome of an expected Future_phenomenon. Instead of Future_phenomenon an Interested_party that will be involved in the Future_phenomenon may be mentioned. In both construals, the two phenomena are asymmetrical and consequently they have no joint syntactic realization. Such potential augurs well for the 1990s Its appearance was an ill omen. Cold-blooded words do not necessarily betoken a callous nature. I wish I could say my success bodes well for him."@en ;
rdfs:label "Omen" ;
rdfs:subClassOf ;
;
owl:sameAs ;
skos:closeMatch , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ;
skos:narrowerMatch , ;
"i+s"^^xsd:string ;
"One phenomenon, Phenomenon_1 is an indication of the current or future existence of another phenomenon, Phenomenon_2. There is no Cognizer present on the scene, in distinction to the Expectation frame where a Cognizer takes (the equivalent of) Phenomenon_1 as evidence for (the equivalent of) Phenomenon_2. Many words in this frame also allow a slightly different understanding, whereby Phenomenon_1 provides clues as to the good or bad Outcome of an expected Phenomenon_2. Instead of Phenomenon_2 an Interested_party that will be involved in the event or state that is Phenomenon_2 may be mentioned. In both construals, the two phenomena are asymmetrical and consequently they have no joint syntactic realization.\n Such potential augurs \nwell for the 1990s \nIts appearance was an \nill omen. \nCold-blooded words do not necessarily betoken a callous nature.\nI wish I could say my success bodes well for him.\n"^^xsd:string , "One phenomenon, the Predictive_phenomenon is an indication of the future or current (but still uncertain) existence of another phenomenon, the Future_phenomenon. There is no Cognizer present on the scene, in distinction to the Expectation frame where a Cognizer takes (the equivalent of) Predictive_phenomenon as evidence for (the equivalent of) Future_phenomenon. Many words in this frame also allow a slightly different understanding, whereby Predictive_phenomenon provides clues as to the good or bad Outcome of an expected Future_phenomenon. Instead of Future_phenomenon an Interested_party that will be involved in the Future_phenomenon may be mentioned. In both construals, the two phenomena are asymmetrical and consequently they have no joint syntactic realization. Such potential augurs well for the 1990s Its appearance was an ill omen. Cold-blooded words do not necessarily betoken a callous nature. I wish I could say my success bodes well for him."@en , "One phenomenon, Phenomenon_1 is an indication of the current or future existence of another phenomenon, Phenomenon_2. There is no Cognizer present on the scene, in distinction to the Expectation frame where a Cognizer takes (the equivalent of) Phenomenon_1 as evidence for (the equivalent of) Phenomenon_2. Many words in this frame also allow a slightly different understanding, whereby Phenomenon_1 provides clues as to the good or bad Outcome of an expected Phenomenon_2. Instead of Phenomenon_2 an Interested_party that will be involved in the event or state that is Phenomenon_2 may be mentioned. In both construals, the two phenomena are asymmetrical and consequently they have no joint syntactic realization.\n Such potential augurs \nwell for the 1990s \nIts appearance was an \nill omen. \nCold-blooded words do not necessarily betoken a callous nature.\nI wish I could say my success bodes well for him.\n"^^xsd:string ;
412 ;
"JKR" ;
"2002-10-04T16:49:01+02:00"^^xsd:dateTime ;
"Omen" , "Omen"^^xsd:string ;
;
, , , , , , , , , , , ;
, ;
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ;
;
.