@base .
@prefix geonames: .
@prefix owl: .
@prefix skos: .
@prefix schema-org: .
@prefix bio: .
@prefix conf: .
@prefix metalex: .
@prefix ocd: .
@prefix rel: .
@prefix dcterms: .
@prefix dbpprop: .
@prefix foaf: .
@prefix bbc: .
@prefix void: .
@prefix dbpedia-owl: .
@prefix dbpedia: .
@prefix frbr: .
@prefix dwc: .
@prefix claros: .
@prefix crm-owl: .
@prefix meta: .
@prefix bmuseum: .
@prefix ods: .
@prefix gml: .
@prefix muninn: .
@prefix xsd: .
@prefix yago: .
@prefix rdfs: .
@prefix units: .
@prefix rso: .
@prefix geo: .
@prefix oad: .
@prefix crm120111: .
@prefix cdoc: .
@prefix bibleontology: .
@prefix prov: .
@prefix crm: .
@prefix cc: .
@prefix shoah: .
@prefix npg: .
@prefix org: .
@prefix gn: .
@prefix ibc: .
@prefix aemetonto: .
@prefix skos-xl: .
@prefix lgdo: .
@prefix rdf: .
@prefix eac-cpf: .
@prefix bibo: .
@prefix time: .
@prefix dc: .
@prefix prism21: .
@prefix po: .
a , owl:ObjectProperty ;
rdfs:comment "A property of the Subtype itself rather than the members of the Category. I tried a new type of hair gel yesterday. Many Type_property adjectives (e.g. new, rare, traditional, modern, strange) make explicit that the type under discussion is just one of the types in the more general Category. Adjectives that denote properties of items in the category should be tagged Item_property."@en ;
rdfs:domain ;
rdfs:label "Type_property" ;
owl:sameAs ;
850 ;
"Type-Prop" ;
"JKR" ;
"2001-06-12T15:20:55+02:00"^^xsd:dateTime ;
"Peripheral" ;
"Type_property" ;
"A property of the Subtype itself rather than the members of the Category. I tried a new type of hair gel yesterday. Many Type_property adjectives (e.g. new, rare, traditional, modern, strange) make explicit that the type under discussion is just one of the types in the more general Category. Adjectives that denote properties of items in the category should be tagged Item_property."@en ;
.